Close

Fannington McDuctsworth

A project log for GimbalBot

Gimbaled thrusters, aerospace-grade adhesives, carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers, and inertial measurement units. This is a space project!

zakqwyzakqwy 08/23/2014 at 03:573 Comments

In a previous post, I mentioned that I wanted to build a duct around the propellers in an attempt to increase their efficiency. I located a company that owns a 9.63" mandrel for fabricating CFRP tubes out of pre-preg, so I ordered a chunk intending to finish up the design when it showed up. UPS dropped the tube off this afternoon, so I spent the evening modifying the CAD model and fabricating the duct sections.

The duct consists of two lengths of the tube notched to accommodate the motor mount and bolted on using a few CFRP brackets. I thought about building the duct out of a single length of the tube, but the motor mount plates would require a large clearance hole (and it would make the motors tough to work on). Length is limited by the range of motion of the propellers; since I'm back to using 9" units, I was able to make the duct extend roughly 1 cm beyond the top of each prop:

Here's the tube as it arrived with the motor mount sitting on top. It's a bit long with one slightly rough end, as expected:

I used a square to mark the tube in several places along its circumference, then scribed a line using a bent cutting mat as a guide. I started cutting the tube using a steel-bladed hacksaw, hoping to minimize blade kerf to save material:

This was ridiculously slow going. I made it about six inches, then did a bit of math in my head (9.6" * 3.14) and considered changing course:

I decided to not worry about blade kerf and got the jigsaw out. Great choice. A bit of sanding and I had two 75mm long tubes:

I outlined one of the tubes on the plywood and did a bit of geometry to find its exact center, then used that to mark the location for a few notches. I also removed a bit of extra bracket material from the motor mount so everything fit:

The props have roughly 6mm of clearance on each side, give or take. Getting that number tighter would probably improve the positive effects of the duct, but I was concerned about my ability to precisely locate the slots (and it's the size that was available, so I made do). I cut some brackets for mounting the duct to the motor mount but haven't glued them on yet; I'm going to hold off until I start on the motor cooling modifications (which are waiting on the rapid prototyped parts) so I can epoxy everything at once. When the whole assembly is together, I'll probably use some tape to seal the gap up. In any case, here's where things stand for now:

Yup, it passes the "does it look cool" test. More to come!

Zach

Discussions

Peter McCloud wrote 08/28/2014 at 02:54 point
I'm not sure about good materials. It's tricky since you already have the duct part of it without the lip. I'm starting the process of designing ducts with the lip integrated and I plan on using Fiberglass again. You may be able to get away with something made out of foam, just to try it out.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Peter McCloud wrote 08/24/2014 at 16:31 point
Looks good! Have you looked at adding an inlet lip to your duct? Something like this. (http://www.esotec.org/hbird/DrawGIFs/Bellmouth.gif Impeding the link doesn't seemd to be working.)
From looking at your CAD, I'm not sure how much clearance you have, and it'd be extra weight, but it's something to think about.

  Are you sure? yes | no

zakqwy wrote 08/24/2014 at 19:25 point
Excellent idea, Peter. I don't have a ton of clearance to work with but I could always trim the inlet lip in a few strategic places to eliminate contact with the pitch ring. Any ideas on material for building the lip? Ideally, I'd find some type of flexible molding that could be fitted around the CFRP with the right curvature and fairly low weight. I suppose I could try to find someone that could spin a bit of aluminum for me, but that seems like overkill. This late in the game, I'd like to avoid getting in to FG/CFRP layup but I suppose that's a possibility too.

  Are you sure? yes | no